Pre-Trial Detention and Asset-Based Measures in Criminal Proceedings: Duration, Review, and Cumulative Impact
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56345/ijrdv13n204Keywords:
pre-trial detention; asset seizure; proportionality; European Court of Human Rights; judicial review; Albanian Supreme CourtAbstract
This article examines the legal and human rights standards governing pre-trial detention and asset-based measures in criminal proceedings, with particular reference to Albanian judicial practice and the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights. Focusing on Article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, the article analyzes the requirements of legality, necessity, proportionality, individualized reasoning, and effective judicial review. It also considers the cumulative impact that may arise when deprivation of liberty and seizure of property are imposed simultaneously, especially in cases involving organized crime, corruption, and financial offences. Through a qualitative legal-doctrinal methodology, the article evaluates relevant Strasbourg standards and the response of the Albanian Supreme Court in strengthening judicial reasoning, examining alternatives to detention, and ensuring proportionality in property-related restrictions. The analysis argues that such measures remain legitimate instruments in the fight against serious crime only when they are carefully justified, continuously reviewed, and applied in a manner compatible with the rule of law, the right of defence, and fundamental human rights.
Received: 13 February 2026 │ Accepted: 11 June 2026 │ Published: 23 July 2026
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
